Re: RFC: New Response type to aid rlog reponse parsing

[patrick keshishian]

Hi Thorsten,

On 11/4/17, Thorsten Glaser <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>I have documented this [1] for interested parties. It is a rather
>>long-ish document. I have done my best to organize the information for
>>easy digestion and reference.
>
> how interesting. I’ve added a “cvs suck” command to the 1.12 flavour
> shipped with MirBSD and Debian (current de-facto “upstream” of GNU
> CVS as I seem to be the only one working on it) to download individual
> ,v files, but that would of course only work if the server supports it.
>
>>Attached is a patch implementing LOGM change against cvs-1.11.23
>
> I’ve looked at it and it’s trivial and probably correct enough,
> so I’ll patch my 1.12 branch similarily and add to the (in)“sanity”
> testsuite. Then you’ll only have to convince the OpenCVS maintainers
> to adapt (if it still exists, that is, haven’t checked) and everyone
> is compatible.

Thanks for the quick response and vote of confidence.

As far as I can tell OpenCVS has been pretty dormant. I was going to
give them a heads up after getting a feel for the reception of this
change by CVS proper.

Cheers,
--patrick

p.s., sorry about my gmail address :(


> Thanks,
> //mirabilos
> PS: Due to Google’s inability to honour basic Internet standards,
>     direct messages from Googlemail to my eMail address are likely
>     to not reach me, or only delayed by up to several weeks.
> --
>> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.
>
> Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
> a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine
>