[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft Exchange Server
From: |
Andrew Raines |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft Exchange Server |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:28:50 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0) |
Adam Sjøgren wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:56:09 +0100, Sébastien wrote:
>
> [... limitations of Microsoft Exchange Server IMAP implementation ...]
>
>> The limitations I am talking are not due to Gnus, but
>> to the IMAP Exchange module, as I have the same with
>> MacOS X Mail.app.
>
> Thanks for the information - it sounds like even if I
> could get IMAP turned on, that wouldn't be
> perfect. Sigh.
I use nnimap with our Exchange system, and it's tolerable.
It's certainly better than using Outlook. And while
MS-IMAP isn't ideal, it seems to be sufficient for normal
splitting, reading, and expiry. I throw in the agent and
read offline for speed.
I wouldn't interpret Sébastien's comments as ``Using
Exchange with IMAP will cause you more trouble than it's
worth.'' If you can get the admin to turn it on, I say go
for it.
-Drew
- Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/03
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Paul D. Smith, 2006/02/03
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server,
Andrew Raines <=
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/05
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/05
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/08
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/20