[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative: port server?
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: alternative: port server? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2003 20:14:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0400, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > > > However, in the Hurd we are more flexible. A task can reauthenticate
> > > > an io
> > > > object. In that sense, user IDs (really: authentication tokens) are
> > > > bound
> > > > to objects and not to tasks. This is useful in many applications.
> > >
> > > But for the authentication token to be valid, it is bound to a task.
> > > Thus, to transfer an authentication token, it is renamed.
> >
> > Nope, an authentication token is an object in the task server and denoted by
> > the task server id and the object id.
>
> Not in the Hurd on L4.
Argh. I meant auth server. If that is not what you mean, then you have to
explain the alternative.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/