Re: [PATCH] libl4 compatibility

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Yesterday, 12 hours, 23 minutes, 38 seconds ago, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Such patches are useless if you don't go all the way.  I have planned to
> work on it, but it will only come as a whole package, not in bits and
> pieces.  It will also involve some rewrite of the existing interfaces.

Alright.  Is there a place (IRC?) where Hurd/L4 people discuss such
plans?

> __GNU_LIBL4__ is useless.  Either you write for the official ABI/API which
> we should support fully, or you don't, and then you require GNU libl4, which
> can be checked for by checking for any of its interfaces.

You mean using autoconf?  What about __GNU_LIBRARY__, __GNUC__ and
friends?  I'm not convinced about the uselessness of this.

Thanks,
Ludovic.