Re: Comparing "copy" and "map/unmap"

[Bas Wijnen]

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:25:29PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 15:45 +0200, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > I apologize for the length of this note. It is not a simple issue.
> > 
> > Please don't apologize, on the contrary.  I find this issues really
> > fascinating, and the quality of your mails are really helpful.
> 
> Matthieu: Thank you for your kind words.
> 
> All: I am perfectly capable of saturating everyone here with careful
> words. I want to help, but at some point saturation becomes a burden and
> I do not usually recognize this soon enough. If my postings begin to
> irritate, PLEASE tell me so that I will slow down.

While the current discussion takes quite some time to read, I'm very happy
with it.  I get the feeling we're picking up speed again.  Of course this
should result in written code, and it has to be seen if this will come out.
But at least for me personally, I am a lot more likely to finally start
working on the device driver stuff than I was before all these messages on the
list.

So thank you for your warning, and for now please continue discussing these
things with us.  Your experience and knowledge is very helpful to our (or at
least my) understanding.

Thanks,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature