[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:42:27 -0400 |
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 22:35 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > There has been other discussions about "selective revocation" in
> > UNMAP; not to be confused with "selective revocation" as discussed
> > above.
>
> Right, there is that, too. We are in the dangerous zone of overloaded
> terminology here.
Yes. This term was not my invention. It is a very old term in the
literature. If the L4 community bothered to read the relevant
literature, these unnecessary term collisions would occur less
frequently. In this case, it is L4 that must change, and the term
"filtered revocation" would be more informally descriptive and avoid
term collision.
It would also be nice if they *cited* the relevant literature
occasionally...
shap
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, (continued)
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult, olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/10
- Re: Why kernel REVOCABLE COPY is difficult, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- space banks and DMA, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/13
- Re: space banks and DMA, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- DMA vs. Persistence, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13