[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let's do some coding :-)
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Let's do some coding :-) |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:23:53 -0400 |
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 21:09 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> 1. Why do we need *another* POSIX OS? What real value can it
> provide?
>
> Because rewriting the 300 something GNU projects is not realistic.
This is an argument for a compatibility layer. Perhaps for more than
one. It is not an argument for recreating POSIX as a core system.
>
> 2. Shouldn't we be looking forward rather than backward?
>
> POSIX is old strong horse, no reason to shoot her.
POSIX is a doddering mare, well past due for the glue factory.
shap
Re: Let's do some coding :-), Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/21
Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jun Inoue, 2005/10/22
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/23
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), ness, 2005/10/23
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/24
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/24
- Re: Let's do some coding :-),
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), ness, 2005/10/25
- Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/25
- Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25
- Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/25
Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/25
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/26
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26