[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let's do some coding :-)
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Let's do some coding :-) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:28:56 -0400 |
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:42 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> If there is a design lesson to be learned from the slow progress of the
> original Hurd, than it is the simple realization that it was *too
> ambitious*. Now the right conclusion from that is certainly not to go
> for something even less realistic.
Antrik:
As with Alfred's concern about POSIX, this is also a valid concern. I
think that within the next three months we will be able to resolve this
concern.
For the moment, I would say: the discussion that has been going on is
only useful if it leads to a concrete design that we can implement. What
makes *me* worried is that absolutely *nobody* has responded to my
suggestion about how to get to coding productively.
shap
- Re: POSIX, (continued)
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: POSIX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: POSIX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25
Re: Let's do some coding :-), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-),
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), ness, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26