[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:04:03 +0200 |
I would agree with that, but for me this is mostly about security.
It would be nice to be able to run potentially hostile
applications, but it takes a lot of trouble, and then still you're
not sure if it's ok.
It takes very little trouble, you can do this with the Hurd right now,
sub-hurds. But you knew that already... :-)
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), (continued)
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/26
- POSIX (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-) ), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/24
- Re: POSIX (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-) ), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: POSIX (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-) ), Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/25
- Re: POSIX, olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/25
- Re: POSIX, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: POSIX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Ronald Aigner, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: POSIX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27