[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supporting POSIX *users*
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:17:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
> Jonathan won't consider anything defensible other than EROS.
More precisely: Jonathan would *arguably* not consider anything
defensible other than EROS, Coyotos, KeyKOS, and maybe a few others.
You should have a look at the slides of his talk during the Libre
Software Meeting where he arguably shows the weaknesses of ACL-based
systems, purposefully in a provocative way:
http://medias.2005.rencontresmondiales.org/topics/os/slides/shapiro-eros.pdf
http://medias.2005.rencontresmondiales.org/topics/os/speeches/shapiro-eros-part1.ogg
http://medias.2005.rencontresmondiales.org/topics/os/speeches/shapiro-eros-part2.ogg
Most of the discussions that have taken place on this list over the last
month assume that you have an understanding of these arguments.
Ludovic.
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), (continued)
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/26
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Michal Suchanek, 2005/10/28
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25
- Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25