[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A comment about changing kernels
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: A comment about changing kernels |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:54:10 -0500 |
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 16:45 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:53:43 -0500,
> "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > However, these delegations are dynamically very rare in comparison to
> > *uses* of capabilities. As an imperfect intuition: delegation tends to
> > occur during program setup, but rarely during program steady-state
> > execution. A delegation:use ratio of 1:100 or even 1:1000 would not be
> > an unreasonable expectation.
>
> Does this include capabilities returned in the return of the call?
> Like, for example in dir_open?
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
When you consider the overall use of the system, yes. Calls to
dir_open() are rare in comparison to calls to read() or write(), for
example.
shap
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/01
- Re: A comment about changing kernels,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Espen Skoglund, 2005/11/02
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Espen Skoglund, 2005/11/04
- Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions, ness, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Brian Brunswick, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- real time and self paging, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/11/07
- Re: real time and self paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07