[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:46:18 -0500 |
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 10:01 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> GNU Arch is quite famous in that
> respect: it produces files and directories with (sometimes) awfully long
> names...
Yes. GNU Arch is poorly designed in any number of regards. This has
nothing to do with the PATH_MAX issue in any direct sense, but if a
fixed PATH_MAX serves to discourage this class of silliness, I am in
favor of that.
shap
- On PATH_MAX, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/02
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/03
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/03
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/03
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/04
- Message not available
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04