[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sysadmins
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Sysadmins |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:37:00 -0500 |
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 20:25 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I am not aware of any provision in *any* variation of TC that would
> preclude you from installing your own boot loader or operating
> system. Can you provide a citation of such a mechanism, or can you
> explain how you envision that this might be enforced by the
> mechanisms that have actually been proposed?
>
> The hardware can refuse to run anything that hasn't been authorised by
> the manufcuter of treacherous computing hardware.
This is an issue that I have actually tracked very closely.
To my knowledge, there is no such feature in any currently proposed or
implemented TC hardware. Can you please identify a specification that
supports your assertion?
shap
- Re: Sysadmins, (continued)
- Re: Sysadmins, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/03
- Re: Sysadmins, olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/03
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
- Re: Sysadmins, olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Sysadmins, Brian Brunswick, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Sysadmins, Marco Gerards, 2005/11/07
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
- Re: Sysadmins, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05
- DRM, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: DRM, Brian Brunswick, 2005/11/05
- Re: DRM, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05
- Re: DRM, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: DRM, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/05