[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
RE: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:01:42 -0500 |
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 15:51 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 12:35 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
>
> > How is that different from:
> >
> > -- Thread A --
> > share_id=share_memory(pointer_to_buffer, buffer_size);
> >
> > send(endpoint, share_id);
> >
> > -- Thread B --
> > share_id=recv(endpoint);
> >
> > if is_acceptable(share_size(share_id)) pointer=accept_memory(share_id);
> > else reject_memory(share_id);
>
> Offhand, I don't think that it is only minor differences in the details
> of the mechanisms.
Oops. That should have read "I think that it is only minor differences
in the details of the mechanisms."
shap
- RE: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/09