OT: protection in SASOS

[Tom Bachmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Wed, 10 May 2006 08:54:41 -0700,
> Thomas Bushnell wrote:
>> Still, he is essentially right.  The conclusion is--dare I say
>> it--right as well.  The best computer systems *are* single address
>> space systems.  Of this, I have absolutely no doubt.
> 
> But this just replaces the war on the best kernel with a war on the
> best memory-safe programming language...
> 

OT: Why implies sasos a memory-safe language?
Of course, using one is a solution to protection, but this is not
exactly in the spirit os sasos, as you now get different logic address
spaces (imo).
If you have a look at e.g. mungi or nemesis, they show that other
mechanisms (virtual memory) can be used.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYz3WvD/ijq9JWhsRAtFiAKCASni/l5r1adiffSVJSPcXUc8/ugCdGwNU
CELpq+BaTJrFoIVG7aoVDHo=
=yGsI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----