Re: Part 2: System Structure

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit Tom Bachmann dies 15/05/2006 hora 20:15:
> >> Jonathan wants it, _every_ subprocess receives such an opaque
> >> donation of its storage.
> > Were did you read that. That's not how I understood it.
> This is the property Jonathan calls encapsulation (and that is default
> in his design, IIUC).

I'm not entirely sure that every use of the constructor needs
encapsulation. The constructor is also used to ensure the identity of a
program, and this doesn't need encapsulation (giving away write access
to the process storage suffices, even write notification to the
constructor, but this could be less secure or need some overhead).

Doubtfully,
Nowhere man
-- 
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature