Re: Part 2: System Structure

[Tom Bachmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> I'd like to encourage everyone to consider this. It sounds like a viable
>> compromise
> 
> What exactly is "this"?
> 

The proposal by jonathan:

>   There are opaque and translucent banks. The difference is that
>   the opaque bank will not issue a given page more than once. A
>   translucent bank will, which is how the user gains access to
>   the content.
> 
>   An opaque bank can be a child of a translucent bank (or the
>   other way around).
> 
>   There is a permission restriction on banks that prohibits formation
>   of opaque sub-banks. If this bit is set, only translucent sub-banks
>   can be allocated (this preserves recursive translucency).
> 
>   If an object is allocated from an opaque bank, it is marked (within
>   the allocator) as opaque, and no parent bank will disclose it.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEcsvqvD/ijq9JWhsRAveFAKCBFEembVJwNwHbO0IkD0laC4bxOgCdE5Ua
G9hPNgAxSBSXRGo29MnzBDA=
=5jq2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----