libcdio-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libcdio-devel] libcdio-2.1.0-rc1 available for testing (Was OpenBSD


From: Rocky Bernstein
Subject: Re: [Libcdio-devel] libcdio-2.1.0-rc1 available for testing (Was OpenBSD vs libcdio vs Audacious)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:21:41 -0400

Ok - these are the dangers when you get an outsider trying to make release
notes. I've made a stab at correcting this in the rc2 branch. However best
would be to just edit NEWS.md and make it right. Thanks for the
corrections.

On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:42 PM Thomas Schmitt <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> first of all: Best wishes for the upcomming release.
>
> ./NEWS.md has:
> > > - Fix handling in drivers,libcdio-paranoia and `cd-info` when starting
> > > track number is greater than 1. (Thomas Schmitt)
>
> Edd Barrett wrote:
> > IIRC, that was a joint effort between Thomas and me.
>
> I agree. We discussed and tested a lot.
> Edd did a system specific commit
>   "NetBSD/OpenBSD: Do not assume the first track number is 1."
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libcdio.git/commit/?id=6a129e460c25d7ba6362983b337085a46ba0fa50
>
>
> > > - Various errors in driver reading turned into warnings. (Thomas
> Schmitt)
>
> > I also seem to recall doing some of the work for that too.
>
> I wonder which commits are meant with this NEWS entry.
>
> Edd did:
> "NetBSD: libcdio_error -> libcdio_warn."
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libcdio.git/commit/?id=30b4a78ac8651495bd57978d89130b8cb5bd4d45
> "OpenBSD/NetBSD: Replace manual fprintf/perror with proper logging."
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libcdio.git/commit/?id=af3debc3704ef5cd02c5f8a89792194073316c69
>
> I did only:
> "Replaced the newly introduced calls of cdio_warn() by cdio_log()"
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libcdio.git/commit/?id=48aaef9063643384705c258cce1506184c69b46e
> This was just an adjustment of my work with track numbers. No older
> messages were affected.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]