[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool-1.4
From: |
Michael Matz |
Subject: |
Re: libtool-1.4 |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:30:16 +0200 (MET DST) |
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> I must say that my spidey-sense tells me that `static inline' is a GNU
> extension...
Yep, but the autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE is used, which #define's inline
away in config.h, if inline isn't supported by the compiler (although it
tests only for acceptance of 'inline', not 'static inline').
> if I am right we should reduce all static inline's to static
> anyhow.
The function in question are not performance critical anyway, so removing
inline probably is the safest.
Ciao,
Michael.
- Re: libtool-1.4, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/04/22
- Re: libtool-1.4,
Michael Matz <=