Re: solving of name conflicts in included .a

[Jan Kratochvil]

Robert,

On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:52:10 +0100, Boehne, Robert wrote:
...
> I haven't gone over your patch with a fine-toothed comb, but
> the idea works for me.

Akim Demaille noted the problematic use of shell functions but one function was
already there before my patch anyway. BTW I found out you are using the same
code many times over the code - would not it be better to preprocess the
file(s) with some preprocessor if you want to prevent shell functions?


> I checked but couldn't find your name
> in the copyright assignment list.  Would you be willing to
> assign the copyright for your changes over to the FSF?

I agree to assign my copyright / authorship of my patch identified by
MD5 55fe631a9b5a634f1366a8e4f68f7a1c (with LF newlines) to FSF.
This contract is concluded according to U.S. law.
(The laws of Czech Republic do not permit authorship assignment and therefore
it must be done by special contract about rights extensions/restrictions of the
involved two parties on the specified subject (program).)



Regards,
Lace