[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a]
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a] |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 02:22:53 -0800 (PST) |
> I don't see the urgency to move to shell functions, but I do
> see how they can simplify our lives.
Uh... "if not now, when"?
Seriously, there's _always_ commercial incentive to do a half assed
job and the _real_ ego competition is to reject that incentive and do
a good job anyway.
Ties are nooses, in a pinch.
-t
- [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included . a], Boehne, Robert, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Robert Boehne, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], akim, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/15
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a],
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Charles Wilson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Tom Lord, 2002/11/14
- Re: tabularized libtool, Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14