Re: Proposed patch for '-version-number' option for libtool

[Robert Boehne x238]

Assignment is on file, so here it goes.

Thanks Keith!

Robert

Robert Boehne wrote:
> 
> Oops!  This patch will need to wait for a copyright assignment, so
> pending that, it is approved.
> 
> Robert
> 
> Robert Boehne wrote:
> >
> > With Albert's sugested change to the documentation, I'm checking
> > this in to CVS head.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:22:48PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Around 18 o'clock on Feb 19, "Boehne, Robert" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 1st: new flags have to have documentation, as we discussed before it
> > > > > should be made very clear what this flag is intended to be used for.
> > > >
> > > > See the attached ammended patch.
> > >
> > > operating systems.  New projects should use the @samp{-version-info} flag
> > >                                             ^^^ addition
> > >
> > > --
> > > albert chin (address@hidden)
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Libtool-patches mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libtool-patches mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool-patches mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches

-- 
Robert Boehne             Software Engineer
Ricardo Software   Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email:  rboehne AT ricardo-us DOT com