[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:37:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 Thunderbird/0.3 |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
+* Requires Automake 1.8.
Is this true? AFAICT the libtool packaging uses 1.8, but Libtool
itself doesn't require 1.8. People should still be able to use
it with any version of Automake (including none) shouldn't they?
I was over-excited. I'll remove that line before I commit.
Also, I'm wondering if there is any reason to require 1.8 in the
package itself. I've just removed the top-level "AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS =
1.7a" to try a build with 1.7.7 and it worked fine. Am I missing
something?
Nope, I'll reduce that to 1.7... that might be too conservative, but I
don't want to set it too low and get lots of bug reports from people who use
ancient Automakes.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
- 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/02
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/10/02
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Akim Demaille, 2003/10/02
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/03
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Akim Demaille, 2003/10/03
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/03
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/10/03
- Re: 10-gary-rewrite-libtoolize.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/10/07