|
From: | Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: | Re: [FYI] loader-dyld.c did not compile |
Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:48:56 +0900 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
Yep, IIRC.This got me to thinking that we should offer both under Panther (in the same way you getboth LoadLibrary and dlopen under cygwin)... what do you think?
It would certainly make it easier to keep the dyld loader in a compilable state :)
If you want to make it use both, that is fine with me, but I'd rather that ltdl prefer dlopen if it is available. Reason being that the dlopen in panther is better tested than the dyld code in ltdl (although there are some striking similarities between the two, `man 3 dlopen' on your panther box if you are curious as to why).
Peter
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |