[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:45:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:39:02PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:09:19PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Besides, you can already do this, but at the moment you have to do it
> >>consciously and say `-Xcompiler -peculiar-flag-for-my-compiler', which
> >>at least forces the user to acknowledge that they are going behind
> >>libtool's back, so it will be hardly surprising to them if libtool gets
> >>confused later on...
> >
> >
> >This doesn't help during ./configure. This is the crux of the problem.
>
> Yes, I agree, it forces the user to add these flags by editing a
> Makefile.in or .am. Makes me wonder if we could have LT_CFLAGS and
> LT_LDFLAGS (or some such), and have automake use these flags if libtool is
> involved in the compile/link.
>
> I'll stop thinking out loud now though.
The real solution is to have ./configure use libtool as the compiler.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Ludovic Courtès, 2004/09/02
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Albert Chin, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/05
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/05
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/03