libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] Cleanup of linux pass_all


From: Jacob Meuser
Subject: Re: [FYI] Cleanup of linux pass_all
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:55:55 -0701
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:19:14PM +0100, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi Jacob,
> 
> On 18 Sep 2004, at 08:28, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> >Or maybe adopt an old idea from NetBSD.  Instead of using names like
> >libfoo.a for archives built with PIC objects, call it libfoo_pic.a.
> >
> >Of course, it would take a long time for everyone to adopt that, but 
> >libtool
> >itself could easily adopt such a scheme, which may help speed up it's
> >acceptance ...
> 
> There is no problem with libtool built libraries, since you can tell 
> whether
> an ar library was made with pic or non-pic objects from the .la file.  
> The difficulty comes when trying to figure out what type of objects 
> non-libtool libraries were built with...

exactly, adding a marker let's you know.

-- 
<address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]