[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Darwin status
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Darwin status |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:11:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Albert Chin wrote on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 06:07:26PM CET:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > >>> "Peter" == Peter O'Gorman <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > my_oldobjs="$my_oldobjs "`find $my_xdir -name \*.$objext -print
> > -o -name \*.lo -print | $NL2SP`
> >
> > Does Libtool have spies on shell features? I tend to believe that
> > $(cmd) is well supported. That would also simplify some code.
>
> Old shells don't support it. I think you need some type of
> POSIX-compatible shell. Certainly Bourne-only shells don't support
> this.
Yep. And since this particular line has no nested commmand substitution
or similar, where $() would provide real benefit, I would recommend
against it.
Regards,
Ralf