Re: some more _LT_TAGVAR fixes

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Could somebody have a look and tell me whether these two patches (first
> against HEAD and branch-2-0, second against branch-1-5) are ok?

>         * m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS)
>         [cygwin, mingw, pw32 ]: _LT_TAGVAR missing for `fix_srcfile_path'.
>         [ sysv4, sysv5 ]: _LT_TAGVAR missing for `export_dynamic_flag_spec'.

>         * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS) [ cygwin, mingw, pw32 ]:
>          _LT_AC_TAGVAR missing for `ld_shlibs' and for `fix_srcfile_path'.

Both look good to me.  Please apply.

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature