Re: 115-gary-libtoolize-copy-fix.patch

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Peter!

Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> | Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
> |
> | If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
> |
> 
> Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.

Okay, thanks! It appears to be doing the right thing here, certainly.

If by ugly, you are referring to 2 forked tars per file copy, I did
it this way to minimise code churn on branch-2-0.  I agree that it
would be sensible to rewrite the func_copy_* functions to collect a
filtered list of filenames, and then copy them all in on serial operation
(with 2 forked tars overall).  I'll add that to TODO on HEAD.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature