[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Solaris whole_archive update
From: |
Ralf Menzel |
Subject: |
Re: Solaris whole_archive update |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:02:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, usg-unix-v) |
Hi,
Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> For now it would suffice if you tried the following
> (additionally to making sure there are no regressions in the test
> suite): for each $CC above, go to the build dir, and execute
>
[snip]
> $LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS -static -o main_static main.lo
> libcee.la
> $LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o main main.lo libcee.la
>
> The last two commands should compile and the binaries return 0.
OK, I get
[anarion:conv]324> ./main ; echo $?
0
[anarion:conv]325> ./main_static ; echo $?
0
for all four compilers (gcc 3.4.3 and Sun Workshop 6.2, 8 and 9) for
branch-1-5 as well as for branch-2-0.
Bye,
Ralf Menzel
- Solaris whole_archive update, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/22
- Re: Solaris whole_archive update, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/22
- Re: Solaris whole_archive update, Ralf Menzel, 2005/04/23
- Re: Solaris whole_archive update, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/23
- Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9 [Was: Solaris whole_archive update], Ralf Menzel, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9 [Was: Solaris whole_archive update], Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9, Ralf Menzel, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9, Ralf Menzel, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/24
- Re: Fortran test fail for Solaris Workshop 9, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/04/26