Re: Win32 libltdl issue

[Charles Wilson]

[/begin beat dead horse]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Sorry, I was looking at 1.4.3, which is nowhere near as sophisticated as 
> that. Still the point remains, there's a fair chunk of processing here 
> to determine some things that the linker now handles transparently.
                                ^^^
         only one of the available linkers on the win32 platform

Now, me, I don't care whether non-gcc win32 compilers work with libtool. 
 But maybe somebody out there does, and I'd hate to deliberately break 
something that is (probably) currently working, without a better reason 
than just "because".

[/end beat dead horse]

--
Chuck