[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
white space unification?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
white space unification? |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:52:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Do you guys mind if I run libtool.m4 and ltmain.m4sh through `unexpand',
and remove all trailing white space (all branches)?
Furthermore, can I put a rule to this into HACKING, or maybe even have
`commit' do this by itself, if unexpand is available? (sh.test is fine,
too, if you don't want commit to alter the source).
Rationale: I keep seeing white space diffs when looking at hacked up
libtool variants. I don't want to see this clutter. The 4K saving for
libtool.m4 is a nice but largely irrelevant side effect.
On a related note: branch-2-0/HEAD m4 magic to produce all the output
variables leaves quite a number of empty lines in `configure'? Do you
mind if I create a patch to remove many of them by scattering `dnl' to
some places?
Regards,
Ralf
- white space unification?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=