Re: minor nits with ltdl.m4

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hallo Ralf,

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 1) In one case, the backward compatibility INCLTDL is not set equal to
> LTDLINCL.  OK to apply the following patch?
>
>         * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (LT_WITH_LTDL): Also set INCLTDL.

I think we can do it better than that, patch to follow.

> 2) configure output is just a tad ugly:
> | checking for lt_dlinterface_register in ltdl.h... checking for ltdl.h... yes
> | checking for lt_dlinterface_register in -lltdl... yes
> | yes
> | checking whether to use included libltdl... no
>
> because the answer for the first test in the first line is delayed until
> the third line, and incorporates knowledge gained in the meantime.
> Should we care about looks here? (I assume no unless someone steps in :)

Yes, this needs fixing too.  I'll look at it presently.

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature