libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCO/bugfix patch 8 of 10: ltmain.in -L handling for SCO platforms


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: SCO/bugfix patch 8 of 10: ltmain.in -L handling for SCO platforms
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:44:10 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi Kean,

* Kean Johnston wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:07:21AM CET:
> 
> Handle older SCO systems correctly.

Hmm.  The original bug report (that added the sco3.2v5 line) is here:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=298
I don't quite understand it, though.  What exactly is going wrong here?

Cheers,
Ralf

> 2005-10-24  Kean Johnston  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * ltmain.in: Update SCO system support.
> 
> Index: ltmain.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/Attic/ltmain.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.334.2.91
> diff -u -3 -p -r1.334.2.91 ltmain.in
> --- ltmain.in 18 Oct 2005 07:26:05 -0000      1.334.2.91
> +++ ltmain.in 30 Oct 2005 21:22:25 -0000
> @@ -2559,7 +2569,11 @@ EOF
>             if test "$hardcode_direct" = no; then
>               add="$dir/$linklib"
>               case $host in
> -               *-*-sco3.2v5* ) add_dir="-L$dir" ;;
> +               *-*-sco3.2v5.0.[024]*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;;
> +               *-*-sysv4*uw2*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;;
> +               *-*-sysv5OpenUNIX* | \
> +                 *-*-sysv5UnixWare7.[01].[10]* | \
> +                 *-*-unixware7*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;;
>                 *-*-darwin* )
>                   # if the lib is a module then we can not link against
>                   # it, someone is ignoring the new warnings I added




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]