[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with "fixed" -static flag
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with "fixed" -static flag |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:27:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
[ moving to the libtool-patches list; see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/7097 ]
Hi Gary,
>>>* Gary Kumfert wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:07:52PM CET:
>>>>
>>>> I'm learning that libtool 1.5.22 "fixed" the -static flag so that
>>>> static libraries are linked in the build directory, but
>>>> shared libraries in the install directory. But I don't
>>>> understand why this is considered "better" behavior.
Here are preliminary patches that add `-static-libtool-libs' to
branch-1-5 and HEAD, with the semantics of pre-1.5.22 `-static'.
Tests to make sure this works as desired are still necessary, before
this can be applied (and a NEWS entry). It would help me to write the
tests if you could point me to where in your packages this would make a
difference. And, of course it would help if you could test this patch.
;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link)
< -static-libtool-libs >: New option.
* doc/libtool.texi (Link mode, Distributing libltdl):
Document it.
Suggested by Gary Kumfert <address@hidden>.
HEAD-static-libtool-libs.diff
Description: Text document
branch-1-5-static-libtool-libs.diff
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Problem with "fixed" -static flag,
Ralf Wildenhues <=