glitch in libtool.texi license statements

[Ralf Wildenhues]

I believe it was just an oversight to not remove the `the' here, but
this being part of legalese, I try to be extra careful.

Does anybody see any issues with applying this patch to HEAD, and the
analogous one to branch-1-5?

Cheers,
Ralf

        * doc/libtool.texi (titlepage): Remove superfluous word.

Index: doc/libtool.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/doc/libtool.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.208
diff -u -r1.208 libtool.texi
--- doc/libtool.texi    4 Dec 2005 17:57:46 -0000       1.208
+++ doc/libtool.texi    24 Jan 2006 07:16:03 -0000
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
-with the no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts,
+with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts,
 and with no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in
 the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
 under the terms of the @sc{gnu} Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
-with the no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts,
+with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts,
 and with no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in
 the section entitled "@sc{gnu} Free Documentation License".