Re: Use GFDL 1.2

[Eric Blake]

Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes:

> 
> OK to update the manual to GFDL 1.2?  Do I even need approval for this?
> (The only nontrivial bit is that the  <at> node and so on disappeared from
> fdl.texi, so libtool.texi needs a bit of adjusting.)

Seems like the right thing to me (especially since we were previously GFDL 1.1 
or later - this is exercising our right to relicense under the 'or later' 
clause).  Count this as your approval.

-- 
Eric Blake