[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm -f
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: rm -f |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:38:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:47:41PM CET:
> Proposed patch below should fix all instances. Please test, thanks.
The patch does fix this issue, but the low max_cmd_len test still fails
for another reason (failure of test `enforced lib prefix' with or
without low max_cmd_len). So I've applied it now to HEAD.
Cheers,
Ralf
> 2007-12-22 Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>
>
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): When creating
> reloadable object files, avoid issuing plain `rm -f' without
> further arguments, even if the line length limit is ridiculously
> low as in the `Run tests with low max_cmd_len' test. This
> failure is exposed on NetBSD.
> Report by Patrick Welche.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: rm -f,
Ralf Wildenhues <=