libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Patch] cwrapper invokes target directly


From: Charles Wilson
Subject: Re: [Patch] cwrapper invokes target directly
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:55:39 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I forgot that you have the ability to do this by yourself. Ralf says that he has been busy and will soon be unavailable for a week or two. Meanwhile, Gary is wanting to cut a new release on (or before) May 3rd. Since we are trying to pop out new libtool releases a lot more often, can we defer your patch until after Gary cuts the forthcoming release? That way the patch has at least a whole month to be inspected and thoroughly tested before the subsequent release.

Sure, I can wait. /I'm/ not trying to build in a cross-compile setup for mingw $host, so 2.2.2 works just fine for me.

If I can get some feedback on the '*_with_wine.sh' script I could update the patch to also support $build=some_unixy_platform_with_wine and $host=mingw. (The script in question is the #3 attachment to the message that started this thread. It's here

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2008-04/msg00164.html
and
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/8429

but in both cases, the attachments all run together...)

On another note, I think the $OBJDUMP part of this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2008-04/msg00098.html
(that is, all but the first hunk)

and this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2008-04/msg00161.html
with the one-liner change mentioned here
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2008-04/msg00163.html

are suitable for 2.2.4 and it'd be nice to get them in.

--
Chuck




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]