Re: lt_dlerror changes

[Peter O'Gorman]

On 06/17/2010 08:36 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 4:54 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > Well, this is what I ended up with, it does not change the currently
> > documented saving of error messages until lt_dlerror() is called, it
> > copies the error message to ensure that we don't return garbage when
> > lt_dlerror is called. I think I also got all the places where we were
> > setting file not found.
> >
> > Still, I am not overjoyed with this.
>
> Fails on cygwin.  However, adding -no-undefined fixes that.
>
> AT_CHECK([$LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS
>            $LDFLAGS -o good-plugin.la -rpath $libdir ]dnl
> > --here->  [-module -avoid-version good-plugin.lo],
>            [], [ignore], [ignore])
>
> Unfortunately, this doesn't magically assist solving my problem with
>     71. dlloader-api.at:23:  FAILED (dlloader-api.at:422)
> but that's not a reason to object to the patch.


Well that sucks :(

I suggest changing the LT__SETERROR macro in 
libltdl/libltdl/lt__private.h to print __FILE__ and __LINE__ etc. if 
errorcode == FILE_NOT_FOUND, then running test 71 again. It doesn't look 
like it's happening in loadlibrary.c.

Thanks for checking this out!

Peter