[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/9] Sysroot patches
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [RFT PATCH v3 0/9] Sysroot patches |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:00:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On 7/31/2010 4:23 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I then did a complete (native) test run on linux, using libtool from
> before this series (*) and after. In both cases all of the old tests
> passed. However, the new testsuite, not so much:
>
> - 37: Link order test ok
> - 38: Link order of deplibs ok
> + 37: Link order test FAILED (link-order.at:87)
> + 38: Link order of deplibs FAILED (link-order2.at:123)
>
> I expect similar behavior on cygwin native (the "after" test run has not
> yet completed, but it did fail #37 and #38). I reply to this post
> confirming those results when it gets finished.
As expected, the cygwin test results are as follows:
old:
All 122 tests passed
new:
37: Link order test FAILED (link-order.at:87)
38: Link order of deplibs FAILED (link-order2.at:123)
111: Run tests with low max_cmd_len FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:43)
112: override pic_flag at configure time FAILED (pic_flag.at:48)
111 is a dup of 37/38; 112 has been discussed before and should be
skipped on non-ELF. That leaves 37/38 which are apparently
cross-platform issues with Paolo's patch series. I haven't tried to
bisect it to determine exactly which patch of the series to blame it on.
However, this doesn't get Ralf off the hook for his review.
--
Chuck
- [RFT PATCH v3 9/9] initial version of the NEWS entry, (continued)