Re: libgcj/1736

[Bryce McKinlay]

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Mar  6, 2001, Bryce McKinlay <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would suffice to simply clear "wl" when entering the
> > incremental mode, assuming we know the linker will always be called
> > directly when doing incremental.
>
> Yep.  Please try this patch.

The patch doesn't work. I think thats because at this point, $libobjs has 
already been evaluated taking into
account the $wl value (around about line 3068).

regards

  [ bryce ]