libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FAIL: demo-make.test


From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: Re: FAIL: demo-make.test
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:47:51 +0000

On Monday 12 March 2001  7:08 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Using source updated Mar 12 11:42 GMT on NetBSD-1.5S/i386 I have a few
> failed tests. In directory tests running demo-conf.test then demo-make.test
> gives...
>
> creating hell
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc  -g -O2   -o hell.static -static main.o
> libhello.la gcc -g -O2 -o hell.static main.o  ./.libs/libhello.a -lm
> gmake: *** No rule to make target `helldl', needed by `all-am'.  Stop.
>
>
> In demo/Makefile:
>
> BUILD_helldl = helldl
> bin_PROGRAMS = hell hell.static $(BUILD_helldl)
> helldl_SOURCES = dlmain.c
> helldl_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic -dlpreopen libhello.la
> helldl_DEPENDENCIES = libhello.la
>
> etc, so I don't really see why...
>
> Is it worth trying the multi-language-branch instead?

If you can help us figure this out, it will save us making the next release 
with the bug in it.

I recommend trying the test suite again after a `make maintainer-clean' and 
rebootstrapping the tree -- this sometimes fixes things for me.

Are you using CVS automake by any chance?  HEAD libtool has had a lot of 
testing with automake-1.4, perhaps there is a transitory bug in automake?  
Either way, an examination of Makefile,in might shed some light on the matter.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ___              _   ___   __              _         mailto: address@hidden
 / __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _  _ __ _| |_  __ _ ___       address@hidden
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
 \___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page:  /___/                      /___/                  gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk           http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]