[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linking modules into programs problem
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: linking modules into programs problem |
Date: |
29 Mar 2001 19:12:15 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
On Mar 29, 2001, Nick Hudson <address@hidden> wrote:
> I am suggesting that libtool adopt the principle of least surprises
> and make name.la -module produce name.so wherever possible.
> Is this unreasonable?
Nope. The only point in discussion is whether this is possible on
NetBSD. We have two conflicting views, both have merit, none of them
is inherently better than the other, and both will cause some
inconvenience for someone. I don't have a strong opinion on this
matter.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, (continued)
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Nick Hudson, 2001/03/19
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Michael Matz, 2001/03/19
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Christoph Pfisterer, 2001/03/19
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Michael Matz, 2001/03/19
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/20
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Nick Hudson, 2001/03/23
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Michael Matz, 2001/03/28
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Nick Hudson, 2001/03/28
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/28
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Nick Hudson, 2001/03/29
- Re: linking modules into programs problem,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Michael Matz, 2001/03/30
- Re: linking modules into programs problem, Nick Hudson, 2001/03/31