[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool forcygwinupda
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool forcygwinupdates] |
Date: |
05 Apr 2001 23:47:39 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
On Apr 5, 2001, Stephan Kulow <address@hidden> wrote:
> I would like to add that all KDE libraries are labeled with
> -no-undefined, so there should be no guessing involved. So if you
> see a -lb you can be sure all references to it are resolved if you
> put the given LIBADDs of liba behind it. Perhaps this -no-undefined
> should be part of the .la file?
This would be a good idea, if it were not for the fact that
-no-undefined means the library *plus its dependencies* have no
references to external symbols, not the library by itself. So we
still don't have much freedom to drop or move -lname flags around :-(
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- RE: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cyg winupdates], Boehne, Robert, 2001/04/04
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], edward, 2001/04/05
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/05
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Michael Matz, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], edward, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], s_a_white, 2001/04/07