[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config
From: |
Eric Lemings |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 01:53:53 -0600 |
address@hidden wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:29:23AM -0600, Eric Lemings wrote:
>
> > I was thinking that if the data maintained by pkg-config could somehow be
> > added to the .la files and libtool could keep track (a registry perhaps) of
> > installed .la files, that would just about cover everything that pkg-config
> > currently does. Some of this data is already in the .la files I believe.
>
> Ick! If anything, pkg-config should use libtool. I don't think libtool
> should *depend* on pkg-config at all. Libtool might be enhanced to
> help pkg-config get at certain data but I hope it does no more than
> that. That said, *.la files are already easy to parse.
You misunderstand. I'm talking about totally integrating the functionality of
pkg-config into libtool and thus getting rid of the need for pkg-config.
Eric.
Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/21
- Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Eric Lemings, 2001/04/22
- Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/22
- Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Martijn van Beers, 2001/04/22
- Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Eric Lemings, 2001/04/22
- Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Havoc Pennington, 2001/04/22
Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/24
Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Havoc Pennington, 2001/04/22
RE: Libtool and Pkg-Config, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2001/04/23