Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_libs

[Martin Baulig]

Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:

> That's why I wrote *explicitly*.  You shouldn't get -lm duplicated in
> this case.  If you do, it's a bug.  You should only get it duplicated
> if it appeared more than once in the dependence list of liba.la or
> libb.la; if it appears only once it both of them, only the last one
> should prevail.

Well, that's what didn't work for me. I'll debug it later on.

-- 
Martin Baulig
address@hidden (private)
address@hidden (work)