[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make check failures
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: make check failures |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:05:40 +0100 |
On Monday 16 July 2001 6:14 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> PASS: mdemo-static.test
> PASS: mdemo-make.test
> PASS: mdemo-exec.test
> PASS: mdemo-inst.test
> PASS: mdemo-unst.test
>
> PASS: mdemo-conf.test
> PASS: mdemo-make.test
> FAIL: mdemo-exec.test
> FAIL: mdemo-inst.test
> PASS: mdemo-unst.test
>
> PASS: mdemo-shared.test
> PASS: mdemo-make.test
> FAIL: mdemo-exec.test
> FAIL: mdemo-inst.test
> PASS: mdemo-unst.test
>
> This is on NetBSD-1.5W/i386 with libtool source from 16 Jul 2001 12:42GMT.
> (used "bootstrap" with cvs autoconf and automake of today, gmake 3.79.1,
> BSD sed)
I am using automake from the stable branch, and autoconf-2.50, so I can't
vouch for how well things work with development versions... you might try
that configuration before digging too much. I have received a lot of patches
for NetBSD, and was under the impression libtool was in pretty good shape in
that respect...
> Cheers,
>
> Patrick
> (how can I find out how they fail?)
You can run individual or batches of tests verbosely:
$ VERBOSE=1 make check TESTS='mdemo-shared.test mdemo-make.test \
mdemo-exec.test'
HTH,
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/