[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS
From: |
Robert Boehne |
Subject: |
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:36:11 -0500 |
address@hidden wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:10:49AM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday 16 July 2001 4:10 pm, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > > > Here is the test case, if someone wants to libtoolize it, we
> > > > could add it to the macro.
> > >
> > > Seconded! I would happily accept a patch to perform the test *instead* of
> > > listing values for only hosts triplets that have been researched...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gary.
> >
> > If we use the test *instead* of looking at the host we would miss the
> > case for Tru64 4-5.1, which passes the test but doesn't search the
> > library RPATH, but perhaps we could limit it to that case only.
>
> Then how about augmenting the patch to catch this case? This is
> actually important for people how have Tru64 UNIX with patch kit < #2
> where such an augmented test would fail and patch kit >= #2 where the
> augmented test should succeed.
>
> --
> albert chin (address@hidden)
Albert:
That's a great idea, if we don't want to set dlopen_deplibs to "yes"
in that case anyway that is what we should test for.
I'm having some trouble creating this test case though, how can
I use ltdl in a program that is used to create libtool?
Robert
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: address@hidden
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, (continued)
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/13
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS,
Robert Boehne <=
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/17
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16