libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts)


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:37:21 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

If only I could finish my sentences...

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:48:02PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> 
> I would argue that using your vendor compiler, linker, make utility
> and C library is a hobbiest-only anachronism when all are available,
> in binary form for all the important architectures in service
> nowadays [[from the GNU project]].  Coding would be so much faster
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and more straight forward if we didn;t have to think about vendor
> inadequacies...  In fact we wouldn't even need Autoconf, Automake or
> Libtool!  But if I used that argument, people would think I was
> being facetious, so I'll shut up. ;-)

P.S. Tim, your return address does not exist according to DNS... I'm
removing the hostname part for this message incase that works.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_. Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/  Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=  GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_  Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]